<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.askyourlawmaker.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Latest Answers</title>
 <link>http://www.askyourlawmaker.com/answers/2319</link>
 <description>a view of answers sorted by date for answer page</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rep. NICK RAHALL:  No, I think those issues are addressed properly through the current judicial system. Uh, we have a number of cases for example in southern West Virginia that involve lawsuits against coal companies by environmental groups. Uh, they appear to have perfectly legitimate and [assessable/accessable?] access to our courtroom. So no, I’m not in favor of a separate environmental court. I believe the current system works fine.  

 

REPORTER:  Are you aware of any attempts to get something like that going and what it would entail-?

 

RAHALL:  Honestly, I can’t answer that. I know of no attempts, so the answer would be no. And what it would entail, I have not researched it or in any way know.  

 

REPORTER:  There is such a thing as family court – not a separate court system per se, but – would there be any possible advantage to going to something like that or reason to go that route?  

 

RAHALL:  Uh- No, I see no reason to go that route.

</title>
 <link>http://www.askyourlawmaker.com/answers/rep.-nick-rahall%3A-no%2C-i-think-those-issues-are-addressed-properly-through-current-judicial-s</link>
 <description></description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:52:07 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jeanneamy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2649 at http://www.askyourlawmaker.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
